Sunday, June 27, 2010

An interesting, well maybe not, but then a good topic for discussion.

Recently, I saw a watch from Baby-G which I think it looks kind of sleek, yet a bit youthful. ( I don't know what kind of description it is. but whatever.)

Before I show picture of the watch. I wonder what's people first thought when they heard of Baby-G. Childish? Teens? For primary/secondary kids? To be honest, this is my thoughts when I think of Baby-G. I have to admit they have nice candy colours for their watches. And it attract people who loves pop colours. But then again, is it because of the colours that creates the impression it's for teenagers because it's colourful?

Or is it because we used to wear Baby-G watches during our primary or secondary days?

Or is it because the brand name, Baby-G, that sounds kiddish?

If this is so, is it considered childish for a young adult, say 20+ to wear Baby-G watches? That it is not sophisticated enough?

Or it doesn't matter at all, what matters, is how the wearer pull off the style. Individual's style is more important than anything?

Anyway, this is the watch I eye on


I go for black because it's the most versatile colour. The pink face add abit of colour to the watch so that it wouldn't look too dull. Childish? If think pink makes the watch look childish, how about this?


Black and silver, square face. A more what i would called, mature-looking style.

If these watches are not Baby-G, but perhaps some other brands that sound more appealing to adults, will it still create the childish impression?





(please pardon for lousy low-class like english. the author is not good at words. she's merely typing what in her thoughts. thank you)